Sunday, December 28, 2008

I'm still here



A month of no blogging followed by a month without a computer (horrible, horrible) broke my blogging habit. Actually, it was more of an occasional autobiographical vomit than a habit. Anyway, it broke. It broke baaad. In the meantime I enjoyed plenty of chocolate, got hoips of hugs and kisses from my small ones, lazed around the house drinking champagne at 10 am, had long lunches in my nighty, a brief liaison with Daniel Craig, listened to lots of Coldplay and rejoiced at the change of government in NZ. The first two things were true. The middle part was delicious fantasy. The last two things are too scary to contemplate.

Speaking of scary, we went to a Billy Joel concert a few weeks back (OK, like people under 25 will think that is sooo uncool, but the tickets were free, awesomely close to the front, and he still got great pipes. Yes, we had to endure "We didn't start the fire" and "River of Dreams", but the rest was pretty good), anyway, what the @*$# was I saying? Oh, that's right, Grant went for a pit stop halfway through and saw NZ's shortest broadcaster staggering out of the women's toilet block. We had seen him a few weeks earlier hosting the charity dinner where Bob Geldof was guest speaker. He seemed to get a bit slurry as the night progressed and at question time he referred to St Bob as "Bob Dylan". It reminded me of the time he hosted a special in 2003ish to mark 30 years of Split Enz (I think that was it). He was manic and verbose. OK, that is not particularly unusual for him, but it all seemed a bit too too.

Oh dear, my first post in ages, and all I can do is harp on like a writer for some lame Sunday gossip column.

Oh double dear. The family is spiralling into manic "we need dinner" crazy hour. S'pose I should cook something, or reheat something, or something. Will blog again soon and it will be articulate, and witty and, oh feck it, it will probably just be more drivel, but please do check in again.

Luf and kisses

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Ten questions for our feathered friends



1. To the blackbirds - Why, when you venture into my house, do you hop in, but then try to fly out, trying every window but the open one?

2. Do you wait until your bowels are full before you come in, or do you just shit all the time?

3. To the sparrows - Why do you only eat the bread I put out and turn up your beaks at the fruit? There are children starving in Africa, o little birds, and here you are, further down the food chain, behaving like fussy children.

4. To the seagulls - I see you, malingering around the sea shore, and gorging yourselves on the hot chips that young children drop during a fish and chip picnic, or that are thrown to you by insouciant young couples who think they are doing you a favour. Why aren't you fat?

5. To the magpies - whenever I am in Sydney in the early spring you harrass me. You eye me up and down the street. You wait for the opportune moment, and then you swoop. Why me?

6. To the peacocks - you spend a lot of time preening, and being big show-offs about how beautiful your feathers are, and yet you will hook up with some dowdy pea hen who looks like she fell off the ugly truck. These are classic signs that you are in the land of deep dark denial. Do you plan to come out any time soon?

7. To the tui that sat in the Pohutukawa tree outside my house in Wellington - For months on end you loudly sang the same tune over and over - it obviously wasn't working for you, so why didn't you change your tune?

8. To all the birds in Australia - you sound like pea hens look, but on steriods. Sorry, that wasn't a question.

9. To the ducks - Why don't you figure out a way to stop tasting so bloody good? Humans would bother you less.

10. To the chickens - sorry about all this cage and cramped conditions carry on. But guys, there are lots of you, compared to the farmers. You have nothing to lose, and everything to gain - Why don't you get organised?

Sunday, September 28, 2008

Damn this guilt habit!


I saw my cousin on the weekend (at a crazy 5th birthday party at Lollipops play land - kids know how to party hard!) He was busy fielding questions from family members about his previous job at the helm of a local branch of an investment bank. We knew that he was an investment banker, but I am sure most of us didn't think more on it other than that his (and his wife's) income had afforded them a magnificent cliff top home, and that he was "semi-retired" at 40 to spend time with his family (the inverted commas allow for the fact he still works more hours than most). But I can imagine he has recently been on the receiving end of some discomforting questions, snippets of which I heard on Saturday night. He is a very nice guy, with an even nicer wife (who seems to embody all the good aspects of US culture - open, warm, inclusive, laid back) and I felt momentarily sorry for him for being scrutinised by his family when he probably just wanted to jump on the bouncy castle with his kids.

That I was related to an investment banker also did not figure into my last post when I pretty much dumped them all in the same basket - acquisitive and self-serving. When I saw my cousin I had to check myself. I don't really think that they are all like that. However, I do think that there are particular industries that more likely to attract greed - and investment banking is one of them. And while I don't believe that a desire to make lots of moolah is dangerous per se, when it is combined with questionable ethics, and has broad impact, it is a problem. A problem that seems intractable.

Right, I am well over writing about things I know little about. Perhaps in my next post I can talk about the Herculean effort I put into cleaning that *@#*$*@ oven of ours on Sunday. I told my husband that it is the last oven I ever clean, and that if we need to clean the oven in whatever rental we move to when we are renovating, he is doing it. Our new oven will not exert these dainty fingers. Bless you De Dietrich, for developing pyrolytic technology.

Tuesday, September 16, 2008

Where did all the good guys go?



Markets are feeling the full force of sub-prime mortgage crisis. We knew it would happen, but we didn't know how hard we were going to fall. It makes me wonder - where did all the decent, ethical business people in the financial services sector go to in the last decade? Did they get pushed off the back of a truck?

We will always have this problem - those who are concerned about the fellow inhabitants of this planet don't end up in finance companies or investment banks. They become humanitarians, public servants, counsellors, volunteer workers, politicians (yes, I know, not all politicians are there for altruistic reasons, but some must be!) Nobody runs a finance company because they want to make the world a better place. No-one becomes an investment banker because they care about the malaria epidemic or the plight of the working poor. They do it because they care about money and how it will make its way into their pockets. So why should this be a problem? Ideally, as well as making lots of money for themselves, they are providing a necessary service that moves money and capital efficiently to where it is needed, it assists in economic growth and we all benefit as a result. Because of the trickle down effect, even the poor and vulnerable are on the winning team.

Great in theory, but the pursuit of short term profit maximisation doesn't always align with economic growth and the needs of the people within that economy. The greed of an unethical few can drag the rest of us into the financial poo. It can cripple our economies. It can make the working poor, the unemployed poor. By shattering the economy it reduces the money available to deal with problems like malaria and AIDS. This is that other trickle down effect that they don't teach you about in Economics 101.

Monday, August 25, 2008


Fashion - a glimpse of the past


I have been reading a few fashion blogs lately - ya know, the ones with the pretty pictures - in particular, The Sartorialist. Like most women, I care about what I put on, but until recent times I have never been particularly interested in "farshion" as we call it in my house. To be an utter bore, I will bring up that Daniel Pink book yet again. I am wondering whether my increased interest in aesthetics has something to do with my right brain looking for a bit of action. A new found desire for good design also has implications for our house renovation. We are spending enough on it now to warrant moving into a home in a better area. But we love the idea of a well thought out home, designed with our family in mind. So we stays put.

Getting back to farshion, I marvel at all the beautiful young things on these blogs (another interesting one is Face Hunter). An Aunt recently had a photo posted on facebook of her with her ex in the 60s. She looked like a beauty queen. She commented that all young people seem beautiful through the filter of age. It makes me think of myself 15 years ago. I was 17 and embarrassed at being small and thin. Being a uni student in the days of grunge meant I could cover up with baggy jeans, work boots and vintage men's shirts and (cringe) pyjama tops picked up from the op shop. I curse myself for not embracing my youth when I could have been more adventurous with clothing.

Anways, the point of this blog was post a few more family photos (many from my father's cousin's mother's side - no blood relation to me, but they were the best dressed in the pile!). I love how years ago dress was so much more formal. Impractical, but lovely to look at.

Once upon a time, dressing up didn't mean wearing a dress, or jacket - you did that anyway. Dressing up meant donning your furs:


When one picnicked, one slouched around in vests, bowties, and jackets:


When one dressed as a hobo, one simply wore one's suit askew:


How embarrassing! One has been photographed in one's bathers!


I love how dapper the man on the left looks:



I think these ladies are playing at dress-ups with the vintage wear of the day - the point gets lost through time however!


My grandparents were factory workers. Granny had to make most of her own clothes. Here she is, 20 or 21, pregnant and two kids in tow. What an effort it must have been to turn herself out so well (being so young must have helped):


I included this because my father (left) looks like he could have flown home using those protrusions on his head - bless his little knitted jumper:

Saturday, August 23, 2008

Big picture thinking



At the risk of banging on a bit too much about this Daniel Pink book, he has had my head cogs working overtime, and I can't resist another A Whole New Mind post. I have had one of those wonderful "eureka" moments that he talks about in his book, when seemingly disparate ideas and/or experiences work together and you come to a realisation. Hopefully that realisation will be the solution to what you thought was an intractable problem, or perhaps it will be some incredible business idea. This time around my "aha!" moment is simply an answer to a niggling question I had about another book I read recently, which I will give some attention to here as I quite enjoyed it.

The book is another business paperback that my husband ordered through Amazon, John Seddon's Systems Thinking in the Public Sector, which provides what I think is a fascinating insight into how systems thinking can benefit these service organisations. While this sounds dry, his style is very plain speaking, and even quite emotive at times. His approach to improving systems is so simple, elegant, and brimming with common sense that, for me, it borders on genius.

Even I find it a little odd that a full time mum reads and finds a book of this title interesting, but bear with me. When I lived in Sydney, I worked in a large call centre for a financial services company. They had a new fandangled call management system based around targets for productivity and quality. The quality aspect was really just about ticking the boxes with each call you received. Did you answer the call in the proscribed manner? Did you ask all the right questions? Were you efficient at retrieving information? Did you sign off in the correct manner? The productivity measures were where I felt something had gone really wrong for the business. Eighty five percent of all calls needed to be answered within 15 seconds, and to achieve "job mastery" a call centre worker needed to field 80 or more calls a shift. Some customer service representatives answered upwards of 100 calls daily.

(PS: if you have made it this far and are bored out of your brain, read the post under this one - it is all touchy feely and lovely)

An important part of our role was follow up work from calls - checking on requests to the redemptions team, passing on complaints, finding documents, faxing out information that and been requested, etc. However, we were not and could not be measured on this work. Those, like myself, who cared about the customer (I am not immune to a bit of self-aggrandisement from time to time ;-)) would make sure this work was completed, but it took us away from answering calls and we struggled to meet the productivity targets. Others in the call centre met their productivity and quality targets consistently every fortnight, which I think had something to do with them not spending much time on follow up work. Another trick mastered by the crafty was to hang up on a call the moment it beeped through - of course all that meant was that the poor sod who had been waiting in the call queue had to call back again, but at least the call centre rep was one call closer to his or her daily target. Unsurprisingly, a lot of calls I fielded pertained to work that should have been, but didn't get done, and I spent a lot of the day dealing with angry and frustrated financial advisors and their assistants. Fed up with the mutual exclusivity of providing good customer service and meeting targets, I quit the job after nine months. Looking back, it always bothered me.

Seddon, in his book, brought home to me the reasons why this system didn't work - it was because we were there to serve the targets, not the customer. The first question that Seddon would ask is - What is the purpose of the organisation? If the purpose is to provide financial instruments through which people can invest, grow their assets and then redeem their investment when the time is right, then we need to ask whether or not this purpose is being achieved by the current system. If I were to just look at the redemption aspect of the system, I would say it was not a satisfactory service. There were long delays in redeeming funds and anxious customers would make several calls to follow up on progress. The problem, according to systems thinkers like Seddon, is that targets institutionalise waste - ie they create massive amounts of rework. Many of the calls put through the centre would not have been made if a request (such as for a redemption) had been resolved at first point of contact. In effect calls like these are the waste of service industry. And every unnecessary call brings with a load of follow up work - more waste. If we had focused on achieving purpose with our system instead of achieving targets, the waste could have been stripped out, and a more efficient system could have emerged.


Another aspect of the Systems Thinking approach that hit the mark with me was the idea that customer service and administration did not necessarily need to be separated. Why not give service reps the power to complete the most common admin tasks and resolve as many requests as possible at first point of contact? Infrequent and very complex requests can still be passed on to specialists.

I am probably delving into it a bit too much now - if you find this vaguely intriguing, I recommend reading the book. I am no specialist, yet found it a great read, and honked with laughter at some of the ridiculous aspects of public sector services provision in the UK (which I am sure you can find carbon copies of here in NZ).

But there was one thing about this book that niggled and niggled at me - it all seemed so bloody obvious - why didn't managers in the organisations he spoke of see where they were going wrong and right the course? (Actually, as Seddon points out, it is usually the underlings that have a firmer grasp on system failings). The other niggle I had was why could I not define purpose for each of the projects he spoke of so succinctly as he could.

This brings me back to Pink's book. As I have mentioned in a previous post, people who are good right brain thinkers can contextualise well and see the "big picture". Big picture thinkers don't get mired in the detail. They are like giraffes, poking their heads over the tree canopy, looking out for landmarks, and getting a good understanding of where they are heading. I think Seddon is one of those very good big picture thinkers. I would hazard to guess that with his years of experience, identifying purpose, and what is needed to achieve purpose has become second nature to him. I also think that his ability to write a book that makes his solutions seem so blindingly obvious is a testament to his superior grasp of the big picture - he just makes it seem so simple.

To contrast with this, I was reading a post today by a technology guy who was essentially arguing a similar point to Seddon - that good solutions require systems thinking. Good solutions are elegant, purposeful and not necessarily about complex document and content management systems that can impede a worker's ability to "join the dots". But, my God! His blog was opaque and mired in detail. It barely communicated his point. He is smart and has a lot of information in his head - but he doesn't see the big picture clearly, and I suspect he believes the important stuff is tied up somewhere in the mess of extraneous information he provides (I can't believe that she of the rambling post dares to charge another with such a crime!).

My husband lies somewhere on the continuum between the blogger and Seddon (closer to Seddon). I have noticed that over the years he has developed into a good big picture thinker. His thinking has changed to the extent that he has become frustrated with the constraints of his organisation, which is very traditional in its approach - apply technology to a problem, stir, and simmer for 12-24 months. I sincerely hope that this does not dispirit him too much - he does a great job! Love you darling :-)

Righto - my next blog will be less dry.

Thursday, August 21, 2008



That warm, fuzzy feeling



On Wednesday night I joined about 160 others for a viewing of "Smart People", a movie I liked much to my surprise, given the lacklustre reviews. The movie session was arranged as a fund raiser for an acquaintance who at 32 has a terminal illness, and who could do with some extra cash to cover her medical and other expenses. She doesn't know about it yet. A few friends will be going to her place tomorrow to let her know that around $4000 has been raised for her, with more to follow if plans for an auction take off. Originally they were nervous about selling 100 tickets, to generate profit of $1000. But around 200 tickets were snapped up very quickly, and donations rolled in. I am touched by the generosity and empathy displayed by people, including those that have never known her. Some days I feel a bit cynical about the world. There are so many negative stories out there, it is hard not to. Wednesday night was a good antidote.

Three of the donations came from women on my father's side of the family - his sister, a cousin and her daughter. I picked the donations up from the mailbox after I had been out grocery shopping with two ratty toddlers who had worn me thin (they were tired). The kindness of these woman to a stranger gave me a lift that carried me through the rest of the day. Coincidentally, also in mail was a CD full of over 300 old family photos that had been compiled by another cousin of my father's (the brother of one of the women) and his son. Every photo had been carefully retouched and many of them date back over a century. The photos had been passed down the generations, and added to in an album until technology made it possible to easily distribute the images amongst every member of the family. What an incredible gift. And another blow to my cynicism.

My father is lucky to have come from a family full of very caring and empathetic people, on both his mother's and father's side. My grandmother is a soft touch, and I remember her often in tears over the TV commercials during the Ethiopian famine in the 80's. Her daughter, Eileen, is one of the kindest, gentlest, and most generous people I know. A grandmother herself now, she devotes a lot of time to helping to care for her eight grandchildren. My father's cousin who compiled the CD, Athol, lost his mother and father (my grandfather's brother) when he was in his teens/early 20s. They died five years apart, both of heart failure (I think).

Athol included a memorial notice for his parents in the CD:

Twenty years have gone by,
Many times we have wished you would walk through the door,
Forever held close in our hearts, mum and dad.


He, his brother, John, and his sister, Noelene (who donated the money) were also devastated when their sister, Raewyn, died of a sudden stroke several years ago.

I think this goes some way to explaining why they have treasured their family heirlooms and taken care to distribute photos to the family. The importance of what you have is magnified by what you have lost.

Getting back to my broken cynicism, I gave a friend a lift home from the movie the other night. She is a very talented person, with a real can-do attitude - I have always admired her zest for life and new experiences. She told me that she was teaching blind children about musical instruments once a week, the last session being on the bongo. "I didn't know you knew how to play the bongo", I said. "I can't", she said, "but it is not so hard - all you do is bang it in different places to make different sounds." She is introducing them string instruments in the next session. And that warm fuzzy feeling keeps on rolling.



(The picture at the top is L-R - my grandmother, Eileen, my grandfather's sister, Dorothy, My Grandfather, Ray, and Athol's parents, Kathleen and Jack. The picture above is my grandfather as a baby with his twin brother, Tom, and his other siblings, the twins, Jack and Vera, and Dorothy (centre).)

Monday, August 18, 2008

Upload, Metaphor and whatever...



It occurs to me that this blog is all over the place like a mad woman's knitting. I now have a possible reason why. I am a mummy and in US parlance, I have a "Mommy blog". Bud Weiser in his review of Pre-Wife on The Rising Blogger (too many links..making me dizzy...) makes the following comment:

"This blog is a bit all over the place in the way a “Mommy’s Blog” can be. We mean that every event the author finds note worthy and posts about is not always fascinating. But, when he is amusing he can be very funny."

When I read that I had a self reflective cringe moment. But, you gotta box on. I am waaay too undisciplined at the moment to create a theme for this blog, although at one point I did teeter on the brink of the "childhood stories to slit your wrists to" theme. Actually, there will be more on that later when I get back into writing my piece-meal memoir of a 30 something. (It must be incredibly irritating to people who have lived a long life to hear a sentence like that. I read a profile recently on Diana Athill who has recently had another volume of memoir published at 90, and is a best seller. Death and old age sell nowadays - for some reason that makes me feel warm and fuzzy. If you do read the profile, perhaps you, like I, will find the gawping and wide-eyed wonderment at her 'temerity' to shag black men, somewhat jarring.

But getting back to the point, I am going to resist a theme for a little while yet. And I will flow with any tangent that goes.

I have read a little further on into that Daniel Pink book A Whole New Mind and I just read the part about the rising importance of "Metaphor" as a conduit to understanding. I had a momentary lapse into self congratulatory back slapping (in the metaphorical sense only - I find it very hard to actually slap my back having been born with what I am sure are abnormally short tendons and ligaments - the only way I can explain how someone so skinny can't bend in half - oh I am loving these tangents today). I recently posted a rambling "Letter to a Friend" in which I used the metaphor of a car as a way to revisit some of her major life events and to understand her trouble in sorting some stuff out. Using a car as a metaphor for life is pretty cliche and "old hat" (snort!) but I think I made good use of it in this particular instance. The superstitious blip in the back of my mind (atheists shouldn't really be superstitious) is waiting for lightning to strike me down now, or for my pants to split when I next attempt to touch my toes, without bending my knees.

Pink talked about metaphor in the context of how "Symphony", or the "ability to put together pieces" as he puts it, are skills that are becoming increasingly valued - "...recognising patterns, crossing boundaries to uncover hidden connections, and making bold leaps of imagination." And as he later states "Modern life's glut of options and stimuli can be so overwhelming that those with the ability to see the big picture - to sort out what really matters - have a decided advantage in their pursuit of personal well-being." I like that. In fact I like a lot of what he says in this book. It makes a scatty person like me feel that my scattyness has some point - I am making "connections" due to having my interests spread over a "broad range of disciplines". I suppose other people would still just call me scatty and unfocused. If only they could see that I am riding a brilliant wave of right brained symphonic inspiration flashes, while crossing skills boundaries and grasping relationships between relationships in a single bound. I am like "Gloria White-Hammond, a pastor and pediatrician in Boston; Todd Machover, who composes operas and builds high tech music equipment."

In case it is not clear to those in the back who are talking and chewing gum, I am being mildly ironic. My hubris does not take me quite this far.

As a small postscript, I have been trying to upload images onto this site, but our upload speeds on our broadband plan are in the vicinity of 2M per year. Maybe one day I'll get there and you will have something prettier than text to look at.

Thursday, August 14, 2008

Hemispheres and Mini Sagas



My husband has an addiction. A perfectly worthy one mind you. He expands his mind through compulsive book buying from Amazon. He is a consultant and tries to keep on top of what is going on in the world of business boffin book writers. Fortunately for me, the truly dry and esoteric tomes he reads are borrowed from dry and esoteric people (Competing on Analytics never really took off in our household), and get pushed out the door soon enough. The volumes that adorn our bookshelf tend to be quite interesting 'flavour of the month' material, and I have found many of them adequate for end of the day reading. But I do have some quibbles with 'business lite' writing. Some books seem to be one idea stretched out a couple of hundred pages more than was necessary by having small pages, lots of pictures, and plenty of repetition (Dan Roam's The Back of the Napkin, an engaging and insightful book, could have got its point across on the back of the napkin, perhaps two). And some books probably could have benefited from a bit more rigour.

A Whole New Mind by Daniel H. Pink falls into the latter category. To be fair, I am only halfway through. The book is about moving away from analytical left brain dominated thinking to more creative right brain dominated thinking. With that in mind, perhaps it is appropriate that his approach is not particularly academic. And I must 'fess up to finding this book, like others of its type, eminently readable and persuasive. As I said, it was just a quibble.

For his narrative, Pink relies on the hemispheres of the brain as a metaphorical device to explain where the economies of the developed world are heading. Pink argues we are moving away from what he terms the L-Directed Thinking of the Information Age, that is, thinking characteristic of the left brain "sequential, literal, functional, textual, and analytic." Our destination is R-Directed Thinking, which is, you guessed it, characteristic of the right brain "simultaneous, metaphorical aesthetic, contextual and synthetic (in the 'synthesis' sense of the word, not the 'artificial' sense)." He is not, however, arguing that one hemisphere is becoming redundant as the other becomes ascendant, after all he is envisaging a whole new mind.

Key to Pink's argument are the effects in the developed world of Abundance, Automation and Asia. Abundance has satisfied our material needs, "boosting the significance of beauty and emotion and accelerating the individual's search for meaning" - steering us towards right hemisphere satisfactions. Concurrently, as happened with manual labour last century, automation and outsourcing to Asia have relieved white collar drones of logic and analysis work - reducing the economic value of those left hemisphere skills. (If you are interested in this topic, you should also read Rolf Jensen's Dream Society. Jensen is a futurist who wrote his book a few years prior to Pink. He comes at it from a different angle but his vision for the future is similar).

Pink provides tips on developing your skills for this future economy. I have just read the part of the book where he provides advice on how to enhance your story telling ability (a skill hitherto under appreciated in the modern economy). Being lazy by nature, I was particularly taken by his suggestion of writing mini-sagas. A mini-saga is a particularly short piece of flash fiction told in 50 words or less. (I prefer this to the very difficult challenge of writing a story in 6 words - who could top Hemingway's poignant "For sale: baby shoes, never worn.")

I thought I would give a fifty worder a bash:

As the moon's reflection shimmered on the glassy surface of the sea, and the water gently lapped at her milky white shoulders, Harriet came to the realisation that the incoming tide had stolen away her chance of retaining any semblance of modesty when she walked back to Christian camp.

It is a bit rubbish really - all one sentence. Send me your better offerings. It will give me a thrill. I will post them too.

Sunday, August 10, 2008

Oo er

The US olympic team is on a high and news services are abuzz with the US winning the 4 x 100m swimming relay, and breaking a record in the process. But...ummm...where are Michael Phelps' budgie smugglers?

Yes, yes, I am tacky and superficial. But televised sport bores the pants off me (snort!) I need more.

Friday, July 25, 2008

A P for all



From the NZ Herald:

$135m drug bust: six stand trial

New Zealand's largest drugs bust foils a plot to flood the country with enough methamphetamine to supply a hit for every person in Auckland...

I remember my teachers always said, if you are going to suck on a lolly in class, be sure to have enough for the rest of the class.

The kids and I just wanna say, thanks for the thought, guys, but you didn't really need to.

Wednesday, July 23, 2008

Melissa


As an infant, my older sister Melissa was scooting about the kitchen in a walker one day, when she reached up and pulled the cord that was hanging down from the kettle. Boiling hot water coursed down her face, over her shoulders and across her chest and back. My mother, Rae risked drowning her in order to save Melissa’s face, but third degree burns scarred her neck, shoulders, and upper torso. Her skin literally melted under the heat of the water and in time became pale, gnarled, and shiny.

She has a scar on her hip from where a skin graft was attempted at Middlemore hospital. She was nil by mouth for the procedure, and woke up hungry. She must have burrowed her way into her bandages as she was discovered chewing on her newly grafted skin.

As children we would stroke each other’s back and I remember liking the feeling of her silky smooth, yet uneven skin that swirled beneath my fingertips. To me, she and her burns were beautiful, but to some other children, the burns made her a monster. She never had the freedom to run around in her togs as a child. She always covered her shoulders, and wore her hair down to disguise the scarring on her neck.

Melissa also has a large scar on her chest. She was born with a hole and a murmur in her heart, and when she was 18 months old she had open heart surgery. In the days before keyhole surgery, her chest was cut down the middle, her ribs broken and spread apart, and her heart operated on. I never appreciated how harrowing these events must have been for my parents until I had kids of my own. I look at their tiny little bodies, and cannot comprehend something so traumatic happening to them.

Fortunately, Melissa’s scarring did not dampen her popularity with other kids. She had (and has) a lucky combination of being full of charisma, having the gift of the gab, and being beautiful. Her presence is felt in a room. Unsurprisingly, Melissa always had a good-looking boyfriend on the go. I remember one of them being particularly crushed when she jilted him. I could not comprehend why she would dump a guy so gorgeous…so out of my league. I was her younger, smaller, paler, and mousier sister, who elicited barely a glimmer of interest from boys.

Oddly, I don’t recall ever being jealous of her popularity. On the contrary, I puffed up with pride that this amazing person was related to little, boring old me. I probably thought that if people realised I was her sister, some of the glow of popularity would rub off. I don’t think it ever did, but it was of no consequence - I was more than happy with my small group of friends, and quite terrified at the thought of ever having to kiss a boy.

Melissa made the mistake of making a star pose wearing just three grapevine leaves as a child, long enough for my mother to take a photo. At the time it must have seemed hilariously cute. Unfortunately, my mother tortured my sister with it once she became a teenager. Whenever a new flame, or prospect was to drop by, Rae would threaten to bring it out and humiliate her. Whether she was really that cruel or just astonishingly ignorant, it is hard to tell, but my mother inflicted a lot of pain on my sister that way. For a teenager, a semi-nude child photo is embarrassing enough, but for a young person with scarring, it is unthinkable that another young person may see it.

The morning of Melissa’s final school exam, Rae “confessed” to her that she didn’t love her. Melissa, distraught, never made it to that exam, but still scraped through with a University Entrance from her other subjects. It was her misfortune that Rae had a propensity for inserting herself into the pivotal life events of her children and causing as much damage as she could.

Lacking support and encouragement, Melissa drifted away from formal education, and entered the workforce full time. She was a talented sales person, no surprises there, and did well for herself, but she had some rough years as a young woman, left home early (although drifted back from time to time) and struggled with her past.

Outwardly, Melissa and I had an adversarial relationship. She was always trying to shake me off. I was four years younger than her, a bit of a nerd, and must have been a pain in the arse, trying to hang around her and her friends. By the time I was seventeen, things between us changed. We had lived in separate households for three years by then and the separation, and the fact I was no longer a kid, allowed us to build a new kind of relationship. We became good friends.

Eventually she settled down with a loving, caring, sensitive and committed man. Together they established a family of their own – two kiddies and one on the way. He made some money from professional rugby in Japan, and now, back in NZ they run a small business together, have a beautiful home, and are very comfortably off.

I am grateful for happy endings.

Tuesday, July 22, 2008

I am hostage to a cold virus. A particularly nasty one. I am fine, but the kids caught it, one after the other. So it has been looong days at home, contemplating the state of kids TV. While channel surfing to appease my sniffly youngest child, I happened upon an animated show about walking, talking piƱatas - Viva PiƱata

I can kind of see how we got to having walking talking piƱatas on the telly - it is apparently based on an Xbox game (we have not yet been dragged into the income sucking vortex of games consoles) - but for the most part, I am baffled. I am trying to imagine how the pitch to the network went:

Steve: So Todd, hit me with your team's ideas for kids TV next season.

Todd: Well, Steve, first up we have Tiffany's idea for an animated soft porn series based on a forbidden love between dolphin and father of four, Kevin, and his sea urchin mistress, Pinky. Our working title is "The Prickly Adventures of Kevin and Pinky". We kinda figure that pornography is the new frontier for kids TV, now that we have pushed the boundaries with animated violence. It should ruffle a few feathers, Steve, but give it a few years and I think it will be the Pokemon of this generation.

Steve: Hmmm, anything else?

Todd: Gary has drawn up some fantastic storyboards for a musical series based on the real life experiences of tax auditors, actuaries and file clerks. We imagine this will be aspirational programming for white middle class kids who watch American Idol, but who also want to grow up to be just like daddy. We see feature potential in this one.

Steve: Anything else on the boards?

Todd: Well, Microsoft have approached us about a game they have in production featuring walking, talking piƱatas...

Steve: Let's go with the piƱatas.


PS: If you are looking another installment of my childhood stories, it is in production...with hopefully more funny, and less grim.

Friday, July 18, 2008

Internet Service Providings

In NZ we are lucky to be relatively advanced in terms of service technology (I am thinking of banks and online services), probably because we are a small country with low(er) levels of bureaucratic inertia, and quick uptake. So it is frustrating that competition has only just been introduced for broadband, following unbundling of the local loop network (after the government wedgied Telecom, then threatened it with a chinese burn, then got fed up and passed legislation). Presumably because it was omnipotent, Telecom kept a pretty crappy network, so speeds were (and are) quite slow compared to other OECD countries.

Now that we have competition, we have something new to whinge about. At home we have an unlisted number to put off those pesky telemarketers. Unfortunately, this cannot stop the door knockers who come by shaking their tins, exhorting us to switch ISP - usually while I am cooking dinner and fending off hungry toddlers. They use all manner of tactics, but my favourite is the "I can offer you this package today only" approach. Yes, YOU can only offer me this package today only, but the exact package is still available from someone in your call centre anytime. Oh! The cheek!

And all this boring trivia I have been blathering on about, is why I find this fonejacker stunt so pants-wettingly funny:

Wednesday, July 16, 2008

I am trying to think of a way to open this post that does not involve this atheist giving a shout out to that big pretend man in the sky. A Christian has the luxury of calling out "Jesus!" in exasperation. An agnostic may venture an "Oh Gawd!" An evangelical Christian will say something totally lame like "Oh my Gosh!". An apostolic friend of mine wouldn't even say "Golly" because she believed that all you are really doing is swallowing your desire to use the Lord's name in vain (but his name is Jehovah according to another door knocking friend, which just confuses things, sorry).

Richard Dawkins likened the belief in God to believing in something equally ridiculous like the Great Teapot in the sky (in fact I think he said it was somewhere in the solar system - look it up if you must). What I feel like saying (because my mother cried it out a few times a day) is "God Almighty!", but perhaps I should say "Oh, Great Teapot!", or "Gene Simmons!" or something else totally ridiculous.

OK, here goes...

Gene Simmons! I have been a bit po-faced in my posts in the last couple of months. So let's talk about sex (tee hee, snort). My old school friends and I had our first weekend together since...we first started having sex (not with each other, silly). Back then we talked it out the door, down the street, and all around the neighbourhood. After years of reading Cosmo, we couldn't get enough of the sex talk, having had REAL sex. I had recently been jilted by my boyfriend so I told them that his penis was the size of an asthma inhaler (ha! The ultimate revenge!). Poor guy. They probably erroneously think that to this day. I am married to him now. Sorry love.

You know what? During the weekend with my friends, a couple of wines and we were back to the sex talk, albeit with a twist now a few of us have kids. We discussed how often and how long we waited after giving birth. We gave sympathetic nods while discussing pedestrian "making a baby sex". Then there were the war stories - women's bits that look like they have been hit by a cluster bomb after a third degree tear, big saggy boobs, small saggy boobs, infrequent sex post marriage, post baby, post 30.

But my favourite part was the common feeling that our men had lost the art of seduction. There is something stultifyingly unsexy about your man asking for sex. Like when you are in the middle of slathering moisturiser all over your face while toothpaste foam is dripping down your chin because you are also busy with the electric toothbrush, and you hear a meek voice call out from the bedroom, "Can we have sex tonight?" My friend's husband will nonchalantly ask her while reading the paper, or surfing the internet. If she says, "No", he carries on reading as if she had turned down a cup of tea, or passed comment on the exchange rate.

It's not like this stuff is terribly important to us, we are just a bunch of old perverts who like to have a good "snort your wine out your nose" laugh after a couple of drinks.

Monday, July 07, 2008

What about Arnie?

Sometime near the end of Arnie's relationship with my mother, Rae, my father had a brush with him at the Birdcage pub in Auckland City. Dad was enjoying a drink with a colleague, when Arnie approached, 24 stone, 6 foot something, moustachioed and intimidating. He glared down at Dad, who was seated, and spat out “You’re an arsehole.” Dad looked up at him, and said, “No mate, you’re the arsehole.” Dad’s friend started kicking him furiously under the table. “Anyone who comes up to someone they don’t know and says “You’re an arsehole”, must be an arsehole”, Dad continued. His friend persisted in kicking Dad’s legs energetically. Dad asked Arnie who he was, and he indicated that he was with Rae, who lingered further back in the pub.

Rae would have told Arnie the usual stories she told all her boyfriends, actually anyone who would listen - that she was a victim of physical abuse and marital rape at the hands of my Dad, and that to rub salt in the wound, he had indulged in various indiscretions. Rae was prodigious in her efforts to inform the world of a past that I suspect was a product of her own imaginings, and that over time became more real to her than the truth. She was particularly fond of dramatic public statements. One day, she vandalised her own home in order to publicise her tale of woe to the neighbourhood.

Soon after the break up with Dad, I returned home from school to discover my mother had spray painted his name in big blue letters, followed by the words "is a RAPIST" on the dark brown block work at the bottom of our house. I froze at the top of the driveway, my legs felt disembodied, my heart pounded in my chest, and an ache radiated out from my stomach. Her graffiti was clearly visible from the street. I fretted for my father. I didn't know what a rapist was exactly, but I understood they were not far off murderers. Was my father a rapist? I couldn't reconcile my experience of him as a funny and caring person with this dark word. Not for the first, or last time, I pushed aside my confusion. It was quickly replaced by deep embarrassment at the thought of the kids I knew who often walked by. They would see it, and they would read it. Their parents would see it, and they would read it. Perhaps they would know what a rapist was, and believe that my dear father was a bad, bad man, and that I must be a bad, bad girl. Up until this point, life experience had buffeted my innocence and worn it down. But this was a gale force wind precipitating a landslip. I questioned who my father was, and what that made me. But in short time it was the question of who my mother was that troubled me the most. I quickly learned to distrust her.

Whether my father raped my mother I could not say categorically. If it were true, it would be a great surprise to me. Whether he assaulted my mother, I don't believe so. I never witnessed such a thing, and neither did my siblings. The funny thing is, we only recall Dad acting in self-defence. We were witness to the numerous attacks Rae made on Dad for some real or perceived slight. She hurled crockery and pans of boiling water, lunged at him with a meat tenderiser, and threatened to the children that she would take his life while he slept.

As for the indiscretions, my father is an outrageous flirt, which I presume he was in those days, but he maintains he was never a philanderer and I have no reason to think otherwise. The only evidence of cheating came from Rae's quarter.

“Rae has obviously been feeding you rubbish.” Dad told Arnie. “Why don’t you listen to my side of the story?” My father then enquired about where Arnie worked (he laid paving) and said that he would pay a visit to the work site the next day. Arnie turned and left.

Dad turned to his friend. “Why were you kicking me?”.

“You didn’t know who that was?” asked his friend. “He’s ex-Hell’s Angels. He’s been in jail for manslaughter.”

Dad had no idea of the man’s past, but his friend thought Dad was very brave, all the same. Then Dad explained, “I had my palms under the table the whole time. If he lunged at me, I was going to flip the table and run for my life.”

Dad turned up at the work site the next morning, but Arnie wasn’t there. Perhaps my father was courageous after all. Or perhaps he was a touch a foolhardy.

I think it all ended with Arnie when Rae accused him of an indiscretion with a client. She told me that she confronted Arnie at a work site. I also recall her threatening to contact a client to tell her that Arnie had probably been stealing from her house while on the job. By then he had lavished my mother with money and gifts, including two silk outfits and a gold and opal ring. My mother gave it to me years ago, soon after she met her second husband. “It’s probably stolen”, she told me. I don’t wear it.

Sunday, July 06, 2008

For better and for worse, till infidelity do us part - Part Three

Near the end of the marriage, Dad began to suspect that my mother was being unfaithful. His sense of unease intensified one Friday, late in 1984, when he received a strange call from her while he was at work. “You better not be home late tonight”, she warned, “I’m going away for the weekend. I won’t be here when you get home.”

Dad returned home to find Rae gone, and Melissa and I looking after our baby sister. It wasn’t the last time she would leave us alone together, and I never ceased to find it terrifying. The weekend passed without Dad knowing where his wife was, until she phoned him on Sunday night. She said she had had car problems, was stuck in Wellsford, and would have to stay in a motel. Dad then discovered (by means he cannot remember) that Rae had been away with one of Rhys’ friends, Peter. Although Dad did not know it, Melissa had previously discovered our mother and Peter on the couch in an embrace. Rae paid Melissa ten dollars to keep her mouth shut. While Melissa didn't get paid the second time she caught them, she still kept it to herself.

Rae returned on Monday morning, as Dad rushed out for work, with no time to confront her. But that night he told her that he had made an appointment with a lawyer for Thursday - the marriage was over. The day before the appointment, Dad was at work in a boardroom meeting when he heard a commotion in the office. Dad walked out to find two suitcases full of his clothes on the floor. A secretary told him Rae had stormed in and dumped the cases, shouting “Tell that fucking asshole not to come home!” In a masterful move, my mother took the high ground, creating ambiguity around the real reasons for the separation. But my father’s colleagues probably knew enough for Dad to not be in danger of losing friends and support.

As of that moment, my father had moved out for good. When my mother announced that Dad had left ‘us’, not her, but ‘us’, I felt abandoned and deeply hurt. “What had I done”, I wondered, “to make him want to leave?” I struggled with chest pangs that I now identify as grief. At school I burned with the shame of a child who came from a ‘broken home’. I had been demoted, in my own mind, to a lower rank of child, just above the bastards, but well below the legions of children from stable homes.

My mother must have had regrets. Soon after the suitcase debacle, she called Dad. There was a prowler at night, she told him, and the girls were scared. (Over the years, she repeated the prowler story. She was unfortunately frank with us about her fears that somewhere out there lurked a man, waiting to peep through our window, or break in and harm us and I was often paralysed by the fear of what stirred outside the window.) Dad agreed to come and stay a couple of nights. What she told her children was, “Daddy’s coming home”. I was buoyed, hopeful, cautiously elated.

When Dad came home, Rae tried to seduce him. What ensued was heated, but not reconciliation - they argued vociferously over a phone call Rae had made to Dad’s cousin, accusing the man of meddling in her marriage. Dad left.

Oblivious to what had just passed, I ran home from school that day, desperate not to waste precious time that could be spent welcoming him. Dad’s car was not in the driveway. I ran a bit faster. The front door was wide open. I tore up the stairs, calling out to him, and paused. It was quiet. Why hadn’t he called back? Where was he? A sense of dread crept up from my stomach. I searched every room. I found my mother in a bedroom in the far reaches of the house, draped over some cushions on the floor, sobbing.

“Where’s Daddy?”

“He’s not coming home.”

“Why?”

“We had a fight about your uncle.”

For a long time I believed it was that argument that ended their marriage, and I would go over it again and again in my mind. Everything was going great, why give up after one silly argument? What about my uncle could they possibly have to argue about? I found it intensely frustrating. I felt powerless and useless. When they were together, Melissa would always attempt to play peacemaker when they quarreled. She bargained and pleaded with them. She inserted herself to remind them that there were children to consider. I always felt a bit useless then too. I didn’t have her words or confidence. The best I could do was attempt to cry like she did, but I had to fight for those tears. I felt like a spectator. I was remote, and my parents seemed far away. The space around me shrank and pressed against me.

When my mother told me there was not going to be a happy ending, I felt numb, and mildly sick. I can’t remember whether I cried, I probably did, but I do remember thinking that my happy life was over. I had a sense that life was going to get particularly hard from that moment. And it did.
For better and for worse, till infidelity do us part - Part Two

My mother was a hairdresser before she met my father, but by 1984 she was a full time mother of a 12 year old girl, Melissa, an 8 year old girl, me, and an 8 month old baby, Jane. Rhys was 18, and while no longer legally dependent, he drifted in and out of home. My parents had been married 14 years, the last eight of which had been spent living in a 1940s weatherboard home in Campbells Bay, in the East Coast Bays of Auckland’s North Shore.

In the early 1980s, the East Coast Bays was not buzzing with diversity and excitement. In the preceding years, the area had attracted a lot of young, white families, presumably drawn in by attainable real estate and the beach lifestyle. There were few Maori or Polynesian children at any of my schools, but that tiny few still outnumbered any ethnicity other than Pakeha.

We lived in a suburb of commuters. During the working day, mums would busy themselves with childcare, housework, shopping, the school and kindy run, or the occasional coffee group. There wasn’t a thriving restaurant or cafĆ© culture, and there were few pubs. For teenagers there was not much to do other than linger at the beach, or throw out of control parties when Mum and Dad were not home.

In the early days of her marriage, my mother seemed to make a go of living the life of a suburban housewife. We were dressed nicely, the house was relatively clean and tidy, breakfasts were usually cooked rather than cold, and dinners were always tasty. She assisted with Melissa’s school outings, and was the fun mum who shouted the children an ice block at the end of the trip. Wednesday was shopping day, and as a special treat we would visit the market gardens in Albany for our produce. My mother would sometimes take us down to the rock pools at the beach, take photos of us playing with our many pets, or bake biscuits for our school lunches.

My mother was also creative, a competent painter and sketcher who collected shells, and made intricate dioramas for Melissa’s school assignments. She still socialised with her more eccentric and artistic friends from her former life, and our house was filled with the paintings, sculpture, and pottery she bought over time from local artists.

If this all sounds like a recipe for an ideal childhood, I am probably leading you astray. I don’t think the life of the suburban housewife suited my mother’s temperament, and the cracks showed from the start, going by my father’s realisation eight weeks into the marriage that marrying her was a mistake. My mother was host to a wild beast that she let out for air periodically. She had a temper that could set damp wood on fire, and would fly into a jealous rage quicker than you could say, “Watch out Dad, the crockery’s airborne”.

There was a night when it got a bit dangerous for my father. I was only three, so my account is based on his recollections, and those of Melissa. On one of the car-less days, my father’s ride in the carpool lingered after work and returned dad home late. That evening, my mother had fueled up on wine, and worked herself into a lather over his tardiness. By the time Dad’s ride pulled up, she was in the lounge chanting “I am going to stick him with this knife” while slipping a Wiltshire knife in and out of its sharpening sleeve. A sharpening sleeve isn’t quite so dramatic or intimidating as a sharpening steel, but you make do with what you have to hand. And it terrified us sufficiently.

Melissa and I scuttled out of the house and up the drive. “She’s got a knife, and she said she’s going to kill you!” Melissa screamed. We begged him not to go inside, but Dad told us not to worry for he hadn’t done anything wrong. He boldly made his way into the house and into the kitchen. Before he could get out an explanation my mother hurled a bottle of wine at him. He dodged it, and it made a hole in the wall. Immediately, she lunged at him with a metal meat tenderiser that she had held in her other hand. She raised it above her head, and brought it down towards his, with force. He grabbed her wrist and twisted it out of her hand, leaving a bruise. The following day she went to the doctor to get the “abuse” on record.

Alcohol was my mother’s drug of choice, and was usually involved in her more erratic and abusive behaviour. She also smoked marijuana and even, she once told my brother-in-law, tried LSD when she was pregnant with me. She never shared this with me, but she did confess, like a teenage boy tallying his can tabs, that she drank a bottle of beer a day throughout that pregnancy. It didn’t sound like much until I realised she was talking in quarts, not stubbies. My father also recalls her falling down drunk at a pub in Albany while six months pregnant with Melissa. The advice regarding alcohol and pregnancy was not so stringent then as it is now, but even so, I suspect drinking to the point of passing out while pregnant was not within the recommended guidelines.

Despite all the drama, my parents had their special moments. Rae once told me that early in their marriage she was opening the fridge when Dad came up behind her and held her tenderly. At that instant, a potent wind threatened to escape her. She desperately told him to move away, before he felt its power. But he refused to move. “I love you so much”, he said, “that I will get down on my knees and smell your fart”. So he did, and ended up on the floor dry retching and exclaiming that he had never smelt anything quite so vile in his life.

There were also the numerous occasions when, in the middle of the day, my parents would barricade the bedroom door with an ottoman. Rhys would knowingly chuckle and tell me to get away from the door as I stood on the other ottoman, straining to find out what was going on through the keyhole.

Passion aside, what maintained that marriage for a long 14 years largely remained a mystery to me. My father is an accountant. For me that summed up why a union with a creative eccentric was a Bad Idea, but I will add that he adored weekend sport, and was prisoner to the weekend paper. In those days he was also particularly preoccupied by home maintenance. He can’t have been great adult company after a week of looking after children. As for my mother, I know from first hand experience that she is high on the list of ‘Difficult and Unstable People To Live With’.

But if I think on it harder, there are some clues as to what kept this marriage going so long - a strong sexual connection; my mother’s need to be provided for; a desire to hold things together for the children; and the moral weight of my father’s catholic upbringing. My father is also obstinate, yet conflict averse, and this may go some way to explaining why he flogged that dead horse. Maybe he didn’t want to admit to his family that he had made a mistake. Maybe he was afraid of creating even more drama. But if Dad was looking for a catalyst for divorce, he found it one day, late in 1984.

Saturday, July 05, 2008

Rae’s mythology

My mother had something in her nature that made her the way she was, but her less than ideal childhood must have fuelled whatever strangeness lurked there. I cannot be sure of the facts, as I have found that her memory can be inventive, however this is how I understand it. She has said many times that she was raped when she was five, by a family friend. It apparently happened while she sat on the man’s lap in the back seat of a car that her father was driving. He put a stop to it when became aware of what was happening. I feel guilty and disloyal to admit that over the years, aspects of this story have troubled me. The violation would have been difficult and excruciating for a small child, probably evoking screams of pain and terror. How did the man progress to actually rape her? My mother has a habit of depicting herself as The Victim, The Raped, The Violated, The Abused, and The Betrayed. I am sure this man did something to her, but whether it was rape is hard to know. The story, of course, may be devastatingly true. If so, considering the tragedy of the rape never being resolved, and to the best of my knowledge, no charges ever being laid, I would consider it a possible cause, rather than product, of her victim’s mentality. In any case, it has become a part of her mythology.

Her parents must have had a tough relationship. They lived in Whangarei, north of Auckland (my mother was born further south, in Waipawa). Her father, Les, was as an accountant. He was an unusual man. My father thought him quite mad, with somewhat of a mean streak. Grandma did not want a lot of children, but Les believed that contraception was a woman’s responsibility and refused to use a condom. These were the days before the contraceptive pill, so unsurprisingly; Grandma brought seven children into the world – one boy followed by six girls. My mother was the second girl out.

An Aunt recalls that my mother was a particularly difficult child, so much so that her grandparents refused to look after Rae when her parents went away. The only solution was for my mother to accompany her parents on holiday while the others were left behind with the grandparents. Apparently my mother read this special treatment as evidence of the special place she held in the hearts of her parents, above that of the other children. If it was a misunderstanding, at least it was a happy one. But I have a niggling feeling that it was an early foray into spin. Had she not spent the prime of her life on the Domestic Purposes Benefit, she could have cut it in PR.

The family was quite well to do by standards of the day. They were even the first family on the street with a refrigerator. But their relative affluence was short-lived. My mother relates the story of being handed the local paper by a classmate at school one day. In it she found out that her father had been sentenced to seven years’ prison for embezzlement. Sometime after, her mother, Helen, shacked up with another man (and had no more children so presumably he was of the opinion that contraception was his responsibility.) My mother alleges that this man then molested her and other girls in the family.

Sometime during her father’s incarceration, the youngest five children (including my mother) were sent to a brethren children’s home in Marton ‘for the weekend’. When their mother never returned for them, they realised that their stay was permanent. In the home, according to my mother, discipline was harsh, food was meagre, and bullying was rife. She told me that one day, fed up with being beaten so readily, she wrenched the leather strap from the hands of the home’s patriarch, and turned it on him.

My mother left the home at sixteen, and went to stay with her mother. This was a short-lived arrangement. According to Rae, she told her mother that she had been molested by her mother’s partner, and was promptly kicked out.

When she was 20 and living in Auckland, she became pregnant to a man about town called Peter. He didn’t stick around, but Rae kept her baby boy, Rhys. In 1966 it must have been tough being a single parent. There was no state assistance, so she had to find a way of supporting the two of them from moment he was a tiny baby. I know that she was a hairdresser, and provided domestic duties in return for board. There were also rumours of another form of income, but I will give her the benefit of the doubt. And if those rumours were true, well I can’t imagine she had many options.

My mother told me that at some point when Rhys was a baby, they spent a night sleeping in a digger on a building site. Like so many other stories, it is hard to know what is truth, and what is dramatic license. Perhaps there was an alternative on offer, but not packaged in a way she liked, so she decided to sleep rough in a martyr –like gesture. I know this is horrible to suppose – for all I know she was desperate and there was no alternative – but I also know her ways. She is cunning. Whatever the truth of the circumstances that led to that night, it pains me to think of my brother as a baby, sleeping out in that digger.

For the following five years my brother, a gorgeous wee boy, saw a lot that a young child should never see. My mother still liked to party, and men came and went. It must have been such a relief for him when my father introduced stability to his transient world.

My mother’s parents did not live long lives. Her father went on to marry a woman called Jill, who he treated poorly by accounts. She was young and a drug user. She died suddenly one day, of heart failure. The police questioned my grandfather following her death, but I do not know why. He died of a heart attack in his fifties, but I was only two so I have no recollection of him. My grandmother smoked heavily and died of lung cancer in her early sixties. I was seven when I was ushered in to her room to view her on her back in her deathbed the morning after she died. The sight of her face, contorted and coloured orange and purple, terrified and haunted me. For years I would never go to sleep on my back for fear that like her, I would never wake up.

Sunday, June 15, 2008

For better and for worse, till infidelity do us part - Part One

For years, and despite all the drama and calamities of his union with my mother, Rae, my father would not be drawn into the subject of their relationship, or her nature, in front of me. He was also not one to relive the past while those wounds were still raw. By contrast, my mother never spared us a nasty detail about our father, and if I were not so incredulous, I might to this day believe him to be a very wicked man.

In 1998, worn down by my dogged questioning, and licking his wounds after being left by his second wife, he illuminated the subject of the end of his first marriage. “I married her after knowing her for eight weeks,” he told me, “and it took me eight weeks to realise that I had made a terrible mistake. Unfortunately, it took me fourteen years to end it.”

My father was raised, the middle of three children, in a working class catholic family in Panmure, a post-war suburb nestled in between Auckland’s wealthy Eastern beach suburbs and the Tamaki Estuary. Following a shot-gun wedding, his parents lived for a time with my father’s maternal grandmother before they spent a year living in a cramped two room home in an army camp bordering Auckland Domain. Fortune smiled upon them when one of the new state houses in Panmure was finally offered to the growing family in the mid 1940s, a home shared by my grandmother and uncle to this day.

My grandparents were both factory workers, my grandmother never schooled beyond second form. She sewed their clothes, cleaned, and made the small amount they earned stretch to feed a five-person family. My father remembers his father as a stern man who once stubbed his cigarette out in his mashed potato, ordering him to eat it after the young boy had complained about the smoke blanketing the family dinner. Granddad could also be terrifying when he rolled home drunk from the pub in a mood for intimidation. But it could have been worse. My grandmother recalls a neighbour who was often brutalised by her husband, according to the screams she regularly heard coming from her house. When I asked if Granny ever called the police, she said that it broke her heart, but in those days people did not involve themselves in the marital problems of others. I don’t think that in practice there is absolute equality between the sexes today, but nonetheless, I am grateful that I was not born 50 years earlier.

My gentle and sensitive Grandmother, alive today, was a good catholic who must have found refuge from the drudgery and hardship of everyday life in the ritualistic rites of the church, and its seductive promise of eternal paradise in the next life. She held the church and its leaders in very high regard. It is no wonder then, when she asked Dad one day what he wanted to be, and he said “maybe a Priest”, that he found himself sitting across the kitchen table from the leader of their congregation the very next day. Not wanting to disappoint, my father entered a seminary in Christchurch at 17 years old, and spent the next five years trying to figure out whether the priesthood was his vocation. His quest ended during a weeklong catholic retreat, which Dad used for meditation on the conumdrum. With the end of the week approaching, and frustrated that he could not come to a conclusion using logic or philosophy, he sat in a field and made a plea to God. “Father”, he prayed, “if this is my true vocation, make this dandelion bend over”.

“But for a gust of wind,” he says today, “I would be a catholic priest.”

After leaving the seminary, he enrolled at the University of Auckland in a Bachelor of Commerce. Nearing the end of his study, he planned an OE with two friends, and was in the process of booking tickets for a six week boat trip to the United Kingdom when he locked eyes with heartache and trouble at the pub. My mother was pretty, petite, had curves in the right places, a short skirt and long red hair. With little experience of women, and some years to make up for, my father fell easily for this more experienced vixen, fully possessed of her sexual power. A friend of his once told me that his enduring memory of that night was of my parents spending much of the night getting hot and heavy in the stairwell.

A few weeks into their relationship, my brother, then five, asked Dad if he could call him “Daddy”. Enamoured of my mother, and feeling responsibility for my brother, he changed his travel plans for wedding plans, even as he wondered whether Rhys had been put up to the “Daddy” line. Recently, when Dad was questioning the hasty nature of their union, I asked, “Do you think, perhaps, you were…er…blinded by the sexual nature of your relationship?” He stole my true thoughts when he muttered “I think they call it cunt-struck. Yeah, probably.”

His parents were bitterly disappointed that he chose to marry a woman he barely knew who had a child in tow, but Dad was disinclined to heed the advice of his father. The marriage was a low-key affair, held at the home of my maternal grandmother. My mother wore a tight mini dress in black, lime green and orange. It laced up the front, ended just below her bottom and was paired with knee-high boots. We know this not from photos, the photographer was drunk and forgot to put film in the camera, but because the items of clothing remained in her closet years later. After the ceremony and a small bite to eat, my parents spent the ride home in the wedding car making the most of their updated marital status, to the amusement of the people riding up front.

Embarking upon the marriage was relatively easy compared to the decision to divorce. It must have been hard in those more religious and socially conservative times to face its stigma, even if by then my father was a lapsed catholic anyway. But there came a time when marriage dissolution went from tantalising possibility to unavoidable reality.

Thursday, June 12, 2008

Writing that last post was like opening a window to the past and memories have been blowing in ever since. But the memory that has intrigued me most in the past few days comes from my sister, Mel.

I have probably already mentioned my mother's close relationship with alcohol. As the men have come and gone, and the children have over time slipped out of her sphere of influence, the booze has remained a loyal, if punishing mate. Sometime in the late 80's, tired of the drunken ranting, Mel, who was perhaps 14 or 15, and my brother, Rhys, 6 years Mel's senior, thought they would try their hand at a bit of drunken hypnosis, mixed up with some mischief. While Rae was out drinking somewhere (in those days most likely the Sports Bar at the Windsor in Mairangi Bay) they placed a cassette tape in a battery powered stereo which they in turn placed in her wardrobe. When they heard her arriving home, they ran in and turned it on. She stumbled into her room, and into bed. I don't know whether she heard any of the tape, but it was entertaining enough stuff for us at the time. After thirty minutes of silence, Rhys had recorded, in a small high pitched voice, a plea:

"Help me ...... help me.... I'm in here.....can't you see me....get me outta here.....help me!"

After some minutes more silence, he adopted a deeper, more soothing voice:

"Raaaae, Raaaae, this is your cooonscience speaking. Stooop the drinking Raaae. Stooop the driiinking. Your children neeeed you."

While I don't remember any fall-out on that occasion, Mel does recall the reaction they got to another cassette tape escapade. We had tried many times to explain to Rae how distressed we were by her drunken rants and erratic behaviour. She never took to this information kindly. If we were game enough to bring it up, we would be subjected to a vehement tirade of insults. We were told we were vermin, that we drove her to drinking, that it was her only luxury, that we never wanted her to have fun. Writing it down makes it seem almost innocuous, but the snarl in her mouth, her beady eyes, the slow drawl winding up to a screech, the spittle coming out of her mouth, the finger pointing - I remember it as terrible and terrifying. So, one day, Mel and Rhys recorded her drunken ravings, and the next day, they took the "ghetto blaster" down to her room and hit "play". Mel recalls that Rae emerged from her room hung-over, and bewildered. But, as the penny dropped that it was in fact her own voice from the previous night, she bared her teeth and claws. When Rae was angry, the violence in her words, her tone, her manner, could be vivid, and scorching. It would feel like she was holding a torch to my skin, was blowing a horn in my ears and was slowly squeezing my heart with her gnarled fingers. Mel says that on this occasion, she had never seen Rae so livid.

Mel and Rhys left the tape recorder alone after that.

Wednesday, June 04, 2008

I am fascinated with how dysfunction is passed down - a legacy of genetics and poor parenting could stretch back generations.
It's probably the case in my family. Finger and toes are crossed that I arrest the process.

As I get older I realise that I have a past full of very funny, and very sad tales. On occasion they burn in my chest, but as time passes the colours fade and I am left with tatty little memories that are losing their emotional punch. So it is time to start remembering the good and the bad taste. I have enlisted my sister to help me along. Hopefully between us we can preserve in technicolour some of those moments that shaped us.

Our recorded memories may help our kids understand us in time, the way the patchy stories of my mother's bitter childhood in part explain the woman she is, and in a way, the women we are. (I say patchy as she has a casual relationship with the truth.)

I am thinking that I would like the narrative arc of this episodic life story to be comedic - happy, sad, happy - because despite all the past crap, life is pretty bloody marvellous now. So why not get started with a funny tale...

Around 1986 my mother, Rae, hooked up with a 27 stone maori guy called Arnie. I first met him one night outside a pub in Auckland, where my mother had been imbibing and socialising. My 2 year old sister, Jane, and I (10) had suffered an evening in a cold, old Corolla, scanning the dark car park, willing each shifting shape to be her. Eventually, two shadows approached. One of the shadows was immense, and as the person hulked into view, I was surprised to see that second shadow was not a child, but was in fact my diminutive mother. When Rae introduced Arnie, he seemed genuinely concerned that we had been left to our own devices for so long. Rae told us that on hearing that she had two bairns outside, he had insisted on moving their party of two to the car. That night, Arnie came home, for what I think was Rae's first "stranger sleep-over" following the marriage break-up (although other vague acquaintances had shared her bed previously). Arnie went rapidly from one night stand to live-in boyfriend. This jarred for us, the children, but as years passed we became accustomed to virtual strangers becoming sudden housemates. And Arnie proved to be a generous man with a big heart and an appetite to match.

At this time, Cheryl lived next door. She was, a sad, small, pale and bedraggled mother of two who bore a passing resemblance to Jimmy Barnes. She appeared to have suffered through a hard life of drinking, smoking, and poor treatment. Luckily, she had found an angel in her new partner, Terry, who treated her like a princess, and protected her in a way I am sure no man had ever done before. Terry was a robust, large and jovial woman with a florid complexion who drove a forklift at a local timber yard. Terry and Cheryl's relationship was a source of fascination for our family, not just because lesbianism was a novel concept to us, but also because they were physically and emotionally an odd pairing.

Obesity wasn't all that common in 1980s North Shore and Arnie's capacity to eat was a talking point for the family, and the neighbours, even though Terry was, herself, no waif. One day, this reputation came in handy. Around the time of Arnie's stay, we had a problem with a local dog shitting at the top of our driveway. We suspected it was Terry and Cheryl's dog, but they denied it. Rae, ever the mischievous plotter, hatched a plan with Arnie. The next time a dog left a brown present, Arnie took the usual step of transferring it to Terry and Cheryl's driveway. As was her usual response, Terry sent it back. Arnie crept it over again, and over the course of a Saturday, this poo to'd and fro'd between the two properties. Rae then concocted a faux poo from cocoa, flour and butter, and deposited it at the top of the their driveway, while Arnie disposed of the original offender. When Terry returned the cocoa poo to our driveway, Arnie called out to her, and asked her what she thought she was doing. "You know bloody well what I am doing, keep your shit away from my house!", she fumed. Arnie strolled up to her, and said, "I can do better than that". He casually leaned over, retrieved the poo, and slowly, deliberately, chewed his way through it. "Jesus, Cheryl," she called out in alarm, "he's eating shit!"
In my last post I had a short list of the things that are most important to me. After much procrastination, it is time to think about how I will live my life according to these priorities.

My two beautiful, gorgeous, fun, loving boys:
Get up earlier, get the necessary chores out of the way, and then play my boys, take them out, have fun with them. Listen to them properly, make them feel like they matter.

My hard working husband:
Get up earlier so that I have more time with him. Go to bed earlier for the same reason. Consider what is important to him and how I can support that.

Good relationships with my extended family and friends:
Invite them around more.

Sleep:
Go to bed earlier

A sharp mind:
More books, less TV

A healthy body:
Start running again. Eat less junk and more fruit and veg. Go meat free two nights a week.

Our precious environment:
Introduce a new habit every month, aimed at reducing my carbon footprint.

Our precious freedoms:
Vote, be vocal about what I believe in, keep in touch with what is going on in NZ and the world.

A healthy, happy community:
I might leave this one for when the kids are at school, but by living according to the plans above should go some way towards contributing to a healthy and happy community.

Monday, May 05, 2008

The important stuff

I'm thinking that to have good perspective in life, I need a clear idea of what matters to me most. I think I waste a lot of time on things that don't really matter (eg housework), to the detriment of those things that I love most (eg the kids). So to make the good decisions I am going to list the good things:

My two beautiful, gorgeous, fun, loving boys
My hard working husband
Good relationships with my extended family and friends
Sleep
A sharp mind
A healthy body
Our precious environment
Our precious freedoms
A healthy, happy community

There are probably more, and I will add these to future posts. My next post will look what it will mean to my way of living if I put each of these things at the forefront of my mind.

In the meantime, I'm off to work on point number 4.

Friday, May 02, 2008

Kiwi food nostalgia

While there was a lot of sadness in my childhood, happily, many fond memories dwell in tastes and smells. There was much comfort and contentment to be found in the food cooked by my mother and grandmother. This morning I was trying to conjure up the memory of a cornmeal souffle that my mother made on special occasions. The aroma, the taste and the texture have left a warm glow in the hard drive.

Then this afternoon I was reading about the kiwi cooking tradition in the Listener, and 'celebrities' contributed their fond food memories. For the record, here are some more of mine from my mother's pantry:

- Bacon butties in the morning, on vogels bread with a thick layer of butter
- Bubble and squeak
- Vol au vents filled with shrimp and sour cream
- Baked potatoes filled with cream cheese and garlic and then baked a bit longer
- Cauliflower groaning under lashings of cheese sauce
- Pork stir fry with fried egg, cashew nuts, and pieces of pineapple (my mother was adventurous, if not authentic)
- Chicken breasts on the bone, topped with herbs, breadcrumbs, and butter, then baked
- Shepherds pie made with shredded cooked meat left overs and grated carrot, topped with mashed potato and lashings of home made tomato sauce
- Chop suey with plenty of ginger, bacon and soy sauce
- Vegetable soup, cooked slowly with a bacon hock
- Preserved peaches from the tree
- Mandarins and grapes from the backyard, and guavas from the neighbour's tree

Most of what we had was made from scratch. No packet gravies and sauces, and food didn't come out of a box (unless it was the cereal box). I still would rather go without gravy than have it from a packet - what would be the point?

My grandmother's cooking also holds special memories. A stay at her house would usually involve:

- A breakfast of weetbix warmed with boiling water and topped with a thick layer of sugar and cold milk, followed by a poached egg on a thick slab of white toast dripping in butter, and topped with her own mix of salt
- A lunch of tinned spaghetti that would sprawl across a large brown dinner plate, accompanied by a crispy bun from the bakery in Ruawai Rd, Panmure. Or if not spaghetti then cucumber and thick slices of her homegrown beefsteak tomatoes
- A dinner of crumbed lamb chops, mashed potato and parsley, and homegrown runner beans, followed by tinned fruit and ice cream, and then sweet milky tea in front of the television.

Of course, eating was not all happy times. My mother made her own version of Duck a L'Orange which was chicken slowly roasted in a sea of Raro. She used to boil the crap out of vegetables until they disintegrated in your mouth, yet I remember chewing steak until my jaws ached. She also had a penchant for offal and Irish stew which never went down well with the kids. But it was these experiences that made the good food all the better.

Because she was who she was, she also made the most delicious plain biscuits, however these were mostly laced with marijuana.

Happy times, happy times.

Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Smacking children

The NZ Herald reports that a petition to repeal NZ's so-called "anti-smacking laws" failed to collect (by a small amount) the necessary number of signatures to force a referendum on the issue.

I am gob-smacked that at least over quarter of a million New Zealanders would sign a petition to assert the right of parents to hit their children. I am even more bowled over by the fact that some mean spirited Dickensian group has gone to the extraordinary effort to collect such a vast number of signatures so that mums and dads across the land can hit their children with impunity.

I could understand going to great effort to collect hundreds of thousands of signatures for petitions that would genuinely improve the welfare of children, such as petitions aimed at getting:
- the government to put pressure on the UN to step up in Darfur.
- funding for Plunket
- more funding for equipment in children's hospitals
- more action towards ending child poverty, here and abroad
- improved public facilities for families
- more help for special needs children

But a petition aimed at the so-called right of a parent to hit a child? What have we come to?

Children have rights. They are not sub-human. If it is not OK for my neighbour to give me a smack on the bum because my dinner guests from last night were a bit rowdy, then it is certainly not OK for me to smack my child for whatever reason. Find another way to channel your anger, away from the children, and find another way to discipline them. Good parents don't resort to abuse.

Tuesday, April 08, 2008

Holy crap batman! It has been a long time since I last posted, having promised myself I would post Nearly Every Day. Idiot.

I have been looking at the sad little list of blog ideas from months back and they are now incomprehensible (third generational skid marks?), irrelevant (the demise of Runescape - 14 year old brother fell into deep angst), or not interesting (TomKat zzzzzzz).

But wait! There be one topic I can really talk about, but eeek! It is home renovation! Three little words peeked out at me - 'closed in deck' - and the idea came flooding back (actually, not enough to be a flood, more of a trickle.) It goes something like this:

"Modern suburban life - why the planet will be a ball of dust in 50 years"

-Home owner thinks, "wouldn't an outdoor living area be nice" and builds a deck, preferably with good orientation to the sun, and perhaps even cuts down some trees to let in more light
- The sun beats hard through the gap left by the trees. The home owner thinks, "Hmmm that thar sun is too darn hot", and introduces artifical shade
- Home owner decides the deck is too cold in the evening and commits carbon crime by getting an outdoor gas heater or fire that attempts to heat the great outdoors
- Home owner thinks, "stuff this, if I enclosed the whole thing, we would keep warm, the mozzies wouldn't get me and I would have another room on the house", and turns the deck into a conservatory
- Home owner decides the conservatory is too hot and installs blinds to shut out the light.
- Home owner thinks, "wouldn't an outdoor living area be be nice"

Fooking 'ell